How methodology determines what is critical

International Round Table on Materials Criticality

Resources for Future Generations, Vancouver, 19 June 2018

Round Table participants

Name Institution
Rene Kleijn University of Leiden
Rod Eggert CMI / Colorado School of Mines
Tom Graedel Yale University
Maïté Le Gleuher BRGM
Milan Grohol European Commission
Min-Ha Lee KITECH
Gavin Mudd RMIT
Nedal Nassar USGS
Armin Reller University of Augsburg
Luis Tercero ESM Foundation / Fraunhofer ISI
Steven Young University of Waterloo
David Peck TU Delft
Alessandra Hool (Moderation) ESM Foundation
Dieuwertje Schrijvers (Co-Moderation) University of Bordeaux

In the morning of June 19, there was a session with the same title organised by EIT RawMaterials which introduces the topic from different perspectives (research, industry and policy-making).

Conference webpage

Presentations

13:30

Welcome

Alessandra Hool, ESM Foundation

13:35

Introduction (PDF)

by Luis Tercero, ESM Foundation & Fraunhofer ISI

13:50

Stimulus presentation NRC methodology (PDF)

by Rod Eggert, CMI & Colorado School of Mines

14:00

Stimulus presentation Yale methodolgy (PDF)

by Tom Graedel, Yale University

14:10

Stimulus presentation USGS methodology

by Nedal Nassar, USGS

14:20

Stimulus presentation EU methodology (PDF)

by Milan Grohol, European Commission

14:30

Stimulus presentation Augsburg methodology (PDF)

by Axel Tuma, University of Augsburg

14:40

Stimulus presentation Granta methodology (PDF)

by James Goddin, Granta Design (remotely)

14:50

Stimulus presentation KIRAM/KITECH methodology (PDF)

by Min-Ha Lee, KITECH

 

Coffee Break

15:30

Round Table Discussion

16:30

Round Table Discussion including audience

17:00

 Closing

From 17:15

Apéritif – Invitation by ESM Foundation and EIT Raw Materials